Sale!

Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Nebraska (Volume 47)

SKU: RM0662022081Category: Tags: , ,
In Stock

$58.49

Purchase this product now and earn 58 Srm Points! Learn More
Buy Now
Share on:
The Storepaperoomates Retail Market » Catalog and Departments » Book » Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Nebraska (Volume 47)
Product Description

Author: Court Nebraska Supreme

Number Of Pages: 282

Details: This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1896. Excerpt: … City of Harvard v. Crouch. right to take into consideration any interest which such witnesses may feel in the result of the suit, if any is proved or appears, growing out of their relationship or interest in the defendant or otherwise, and give to the testimony of such witnesses only such weight as you think it entitled to under all the circumstances proved on the trial.” The witnesses for the defendant city were mostly, if not all, residents and taxpayers therein, and had to that extent a pecuniary interest in the result of the trial, from which it is argued that the effect of the instructions quoted was to discredit their testimony. Practically the same question was presented for consideration in Barmby v. Wolfe,44 Neb., 77, and decided adversely to the contention of the plaintiff in error. It is there said, referring to Housh v. State, 43 Neb., 163, and Carleton v. State, 43 Neb., 373: “In the two latest cases doubts were expressed as to the policy of such instructions, but the question was no longer deemed an open one.” The rule thus stated follows logically from the doctrine of the earlier opinions of this court and is decisive of the question here presented. The remaining assignments of error present in different forms the questions already examined, and do not require further notice at this time. We discover no error in the record and the judgment will be Affirmed. Home Fire Ins. Co. v. Kennedy. Home Fire Insurance Company Op Omaha V. Catharine Kennedy. Filed February 18, 1896. No. 6184. 1. Insurance: Failure To Declare Forfeiture: Waiver Of Breach Of Warranty. An Insurance company which, after a loss of the property covered by its policy, with a knowledge of acts amounting to a breach of warranty by the Insured, fails to declare such policy forfei…

Release Date: 06-02-2012

Package Dimensions: 15x246x508

Product Inquiry
You may be interested in
New Arrivals
Best Sellers
Macroeconomics
$404.49
$472.99
Expedited Order Processing
60-Day Free Returns
Fast and Tracked Shipping
Quality Guarantee
Replacement for GE Air Conditioner Remote Control YK4EB1 Works for AEQ12DPS1 AEQ12DQ AEQ12DQW1 AEQ25DP AEQ25DPL1 AEW05LP AEW05LPG1 AEW05LPL1 AEW05LPQ1 AEW05LPW1 AEW05LQ AEW05LQG1 | The Storepaperoomates Retail Market - Fast Affordable Shopping
Check out Now and ...
Get an Exclusive Additional 15% Off …
Exit Intent – Global | The Storepaperoomates Retail Market - Fast Affordable Shopping
Wait, Before we forget...
Get a sweet extra 15% Off Now...